The source added that Gino called Gordon and Fred the following day to explain he had been smoking it to help his bad back, and they added that he was released by police 'without issue'.
'Neither Fred nor Gordon, nor anyone else on the jet, had a single trace of anything suspicious.' It was Gino's bags that were stopped and searched, and a small box with some weed inside was found. 'Eventually, it was clear who the dogs were after, and Gino went away with uniformed police for questioning. 'Gordon, Fred and Gino were all held for some time by Border Force, as Gino initially tried to laugh it off. They're so f***ing lazy, they make me look good' Gordon said: 'They are great, they are wonderful, fantastic, incredible pain in the ar**s. When they landed, out of nowhere sniffer dogs suddenly started circling Gino. The source said: 'Gino and the gang had been filming in Spain, and flew back home on Gordon's private jet. They had been in Spain filming Gordon, Gino and Fred: Road Trip, with a source telling The Sun: 'Fred and Gordon were pretty cross.' He was allegedly given a warning as he arrived back in the UK with Gordon and Fred at Farnborough Airport, Hampshire on November 29. The comments come after recent reports that Gino was found carrying cannabis in his luggage while departing Gordon's private jet back in November. He added: 'So we do get on, but three or four days in it's like, "Move over, I want more room in the bed", or, "Can we have a break?" They don't work hard." 'An hour in Gino wants an espresso, or he wants his eyebrows plucked, ninety minutes in, Fred's missing his croissant and his eyeliner. They're so f***ing lazy, they make me look good. The Hell's Kitchen star explained: 'They are great, they are wonderful, fantastic, incredible pain in the ar**s. When the reality star presenter probed Gordon on his fellow chefs, he didn't hold back while discussing the personality differences. Not a very pretty picture.Ouch! Gordon Ramsay, 56, has slammed his co-star and fellow chef Gino D'Acampo of being 'so f***ing lazy' and a 'pain in the a***' as he detailed filming with the star Ozzy? He love you long time - and sing No More Tears while he do it. The Clash were never media whores (well, at least not until the very end). Crowley, I Don’t Know and Bark At The Moon are keepers, I doubt even he recalls recent material like No Easy Way Out and Thunder Underground.įinally, there’s the dignity factor. Ozzy’s still around - and while oldies like Crazy Train, Mr.
The Clash have been gone for nearly 20 years, imbuing songs like White Riot, Tommy Gun, London Calling and even Train In Vain with the legitimacy and dignity of age. Frankly, many of his finest moments came during his Black Sabbath days, which aren’t represented here (save for a live version of Paranoid).Īnother difference? Longevity. Nearly every song on the first three Clash albums was a classic, which leaves every missing cut (like, say, All The Young Punks, Hateful and Wrong ’Em Boyo) conspicuous by its absence. How come? Well, partly it’s a matter of consistency. But while the 40-track Essential Clash comes off as a sadly incomplete (if well-intended) biography of The Only Band That Matters, the 29-song Essential Ozzy feels as bloated and pointless as … well, Ozzy himself. Both come with the usual pictures, liner notes and yadda yadda. Both cut a wide swath through their subjects’ careers. Let’s weigh the evidence: Both sets are two-disc affairs. Or the ear, in the case of two compilations from punk legends The Clash and bat-chomping metal god Ozzy Osbourne. Much like beauty, essentialness is in the eye of the beholder. Here’s what I said about it back then (with some minor editing): This came out in 2003 – or at least that’s when I got it.
0 kommentar(er)
